Skip to main content

Public opinion divided?




Imagine a town with a nuclear powerplant close by. If its residents displayed signs of  radiation sickness, the finger of suspicion will point towards the plants however much the plant's operator might swear to its safety.
Mirroring a scenario where the town is also home to research centre where the radioactive material is also stored and used in experiments. Now the finger would waver between the nuclear plant and the research centre.

Now to complicate things further, if the nuclear waste from both the plant and research centre was buried in an underground dump a fair distance away from the town, a third focus suspicion would arise. Those suspicion of the nuclear power industry would be convinced that the plant was the source of pollution.

Little bits of circumstantial evidence would begin to circulate on social media as well as in the opinion columns of the newspaper pointing out to the power plant. The nuclear industry would fight back and accuse the research institute of causing radiation leak. The scientific establishment would close ranks around research lab and testify to safety standards in the laboratory as well as the quality of the research.

A third group of people would probably accuse both the power plant as well as the research institute of poisoning the world by using and storing the nuclear toxic waste. Each of these groups would believe that they has the truth and others were wrong. They would criticize if any investigation that did not agree their beliefs.

To find the scientific proof instead is a task as challenging as an archeologists painstakingly digging through hundreds of meters of tightly packed layers of mud & stone and debris in the hope of recovering tiny clues to the existence of an ancient civilization.

Source - The Hindu


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Krishna

She was unable to decipher him. Even while he spoke to her, she felt that he was well planned and prepared on what to say. And when she comes up with queries, he smiled. His enigmatic smile often put her in a puzzled state that forced her to ponder on that for long. Somedays he teased her on how she looked or on how stereotypical she was and reduced her to tears. But later console her like nobody does. On other days he gave her lessons on the political conditions of the country.  He brought her news of the world that no one else cared to give her, a world that she was starving to know more about. He asked her opinion and listened to it with keen interest. Although in the end, he would end up disagreeing with everything.  He challenged her traditional beliefs and offended her most of the time. Even after he left, she ends up spending time trying to make head or tail of what he said. Most of the time she hates herself for having chosen to know him. But she knew that she would ha...

Ocean

  He was a man who remained immovable like the ocean, a man into whom all desires flowed without touching him even a little. She imagined him as an ocean into which the water flowed from all sides and yet remained at rest. A man of abiding wisdom. Although we see the water being absorbed by the sun in the form of clouds, it is not reduced in any way. Rain and floods flow into the ocean, but it does not expand.